|
The idea of eternal return is a mysterious one, and Nietzsche has often perplexed
other philosophers with it: to think that everything recurs as we once experienced it, and that the recurŽrence itself recurs
ad infinitum! What does this mad myth signify? Putting it negatively, the myth of eternal return states that a life which
disappears once and for all, which does not return, is like a shadow, without weight, dead in advance, and whether it was
horrible, beautiful, or sublime, its horror, sublimity, and beauty mean nothing. We need take no more note of it than of a
war between two African kingdoms in the fourteenth century, a war that altered nothing in the destiny of the world, even if
a hundred thousand blacks perished in excruciating torment. Will the war between two African kingdoms in the fourŽteenth
century itself be altered if it recurs again and again, in eternal return? It will: it will become a solid mass, permanently
protuberŽant, its inanity irreparable. If the French Revolution were to recur eternally, French historians would be less
proud of Robespierre. But because they deal with something that will not return, the bloody years of the Revolution have turned
into mere words, theories, and discusŽsions, have become lighter than feathers, frightening no one. There is an infinite difference
between a Robespierre who ocŽcurs only once in history and a Robespierre who eternally reŽturns, chopping off French heads. Let
us therefore agree that the idea of eternal return imŽplies a perspective from which things appear other than as we know them:
they appear without the mitigating circumstance of their transitory nature. This mitigating circumstance prevents us from
coming to a verdict. For how can we condemn someŽthing that is ephemeral, in transit? In the sunset of dissolution, everything
is illuminated by the aura of nostalgia, even the guillotine. Not long ago, I caught myself experiencing a most incredŽible
sensation. Leafing through a book on Hitler, I was touched by some of his portraits: they reminded me of my childhood. I grew
up during the war; several members of my family perished in Hitler's concentration camps; but what were their deaths compared
with the memories of a lost period in my life, a period that would never return? This reconciliation with Hitler reveals
the profound moral perversity of a world that rests essentially on the nonexistence of return, for in this world everything
is pardoned in advance and therefore everything cynically permitted.
by milan kundera
from the unbearable lightness of being
Love at First Sight——by Wislawa Szymborska
They both thought that a sudden feeling had united them. This certainty is beautiful, even more
beautiful than uncertainty.
They thought they didn’t know each other, nothing had ever happened between them, These streets,
these stairs, this corridors, Where they could have met so long ago?
I would like to ask them, if they can remember - perhaps in a revolving door face to face one day? A
“sorry“ in the crowd? “Wrong number“ on the ’phone? - but I know the answer. No,
they don’t remember.
How surprised they would be For such a long time already Fate has been playing with them.
Not quite yet ready to change into destiny, which brings them nearer and yet further, cutting their
path and stifling a laugh, escaping ever further; There were sings, indications, undecipherable, what does
in matter. Three years ago, perhaps or even last Tuesday, this leaf flying from one shoulder to another? Something
lost and gathered. Who knows, perhaps a ball already in the bushes, in childhood?
There were handles, door bells, where, on the trace of a hand, another hand was placed; suitcases
next to one another in the left luggage. And maybe one night the same dream forgotten on walking;
But every badging is only a continuation, and the book of fate is always open in the middle
|